Terri Levenhagen (Hoornstra)
What used to be called "Civics" is now folded into American History. Right now there is a nationwide push to adopt "Common Core Standards" for education, which - from all I've read/heard about it are very good. Not the usual "now the pendulum swings this way, tomorrow it will go the other way" kind of change we usually see. The CCSs emphasize using one discipline (i.e. reading, writing and literature) to solve/analyze practical problems in other subject areas, i.e history, citizenship, science, math - so these subjects should not be left out for the sake of emphasizing reading and writing.
But my main question about the article from the ABA is that they claim test scores on "Civics" and American History are higher than ever among middle to upper class students, and it's just the underprivileged kids who are so far behind - which is true for ALL subjects taught. And yet every state teaches the same curriculum in public schools to all kids, with the same textbooks, etc. They don't omit teaching history/civics to students who are underprivileged ("All poor kids leave the room, we're teaching American History now.") It has to be again a matter of how much importance is placed upon learning in the students' homes and cutures.
|