Jim Cejka
I have some reservations about "America: Fact v. Fiction" - fact or attempt to pique some controversy?
One in particular bothers me. - the one where the 'expert' says Paul Revere would not have said 'the British are coming, because Paul Revere was British.' That, to me is patently inane.
1st - Paul Revere was born in America. His father was actually French Huguenot, his mother's family long time Bostonians. Not much 'British' there.
2nd - Considering his activities in the revolutionary movement and activities of the day, I'd bet he have been quite offended if that professor would have called him British. Patriot, American, Son of Liberty, silversmith, but not British.
3rd - With the occupation of Boston, the overwhelming symbol of the British was the British Army. To say 'the British are coming' would be apparent to anyone who cared that that meant the British Army was coming, not some British butcher, baker, or candlestick maker.
To say that Revere wouldn't have said the British were coming because he was British would be like saying some American sergeant named Schultz, at the Battle of the Bulge, wouldn't have said the Germans were coming because he was German.
|